Why a Canadian Church was named after The Immaculate Conception several decades before the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was adopted in 1854

The Immaculate Conception was known and articulated as such by the Catholic Church for many centuries prior to it’s dogmatic declaration in 1854.
For example, Origen, an early Church Father, though not a canonized saint, called Mary “immaculate”:
His mother immaculate, His mother incorrupt, His mother pure. His mother! Whose mother? The mother of God, of the Only-begotten, of the Lord, of the King, of the Maker of all things, and the Redeemer of all.
Quoted in St. Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea, Vol. 1–4, Commentary on Matthew 1:18 (Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1841) reprinted by Primedia E-Launch, Kindle Edition, 2012.
Origen died around A.D. 254 or 1,600 years before the Immaculate Conception of Mary was solemnly declared.
St. Irenaeus of Lyons, offered this interpetation of Isaiah:
‘Before she who was in labor gave birth, and before the birthpains came on, she was delivered of a male’…he indicated His unexpected and extraordinary birth from the Virgin.
St. Irenaeus of Lyons, On the Apostolic Preaching, Trans. John Behr (Crestwood: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1997) 75–76.
St. Irenaeus wrote around A.D. 175–189. (Ibid, Introduction by John Behr, 3.
The concept of the Immaculate Conception is that Saint Mary—by a special grace of God—was pre-redeemed, and preserved from Original Sin, in order to be a worthy vessel for the Incarnation. Jesus is able to be incarnate as a sinless human being within Mary’s sinless body. It is therefore fascinating to find Irenaeus of Lyons, in the late 2nd Century, articulating the belief that Mary miraculously gave birth to Jesus without labor pains. For Genesis 3:16 describes labor pains as a consequence of Eve’s sin.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First Blog in a Long, Long Time. But a New Papal Encyclical is a Worthy Occasion to Write

    I have not written a blog post in years. It was not really a conscious plan as much as focusing my attention elsewhere. I had gone back and re-read some of my comments on Laudatio Si from five years ago and thought it appropriate to offer some feedback on the new papal encyclical letter: On Fraternity and Social Friendship .  I am not one to criticize the Pope, other than stylistically. Pope Francis sometimes writes without the theological precision that I prefer. But as Pope, Jesus Christ’s Vicar on Earth, Francis’ words are consequential.  Here are some important points Pope Francis makes in Fratelli Tutti:      People are made in God’s image and likeness and have inherent dignity. (n. 39) “[I]t is important that catechesis and preaching speak more directly and clearly about the social meaning of existence, the fraternal dimension of spirituality, our conviction of the inalienable dignity of each person, and our reasons for loving and accepting all our brothers and sisters. (n.
Read more

Did the Blessed Virgin Mary See the Resurrected Jesus?

According to the Bible, it is unknown whether or not Jess appeared to his mother, Mary. However, according to tradition, Jesus appeared to his mother. This is known in Hispanic cultures as the encuentro --the encounter.  While Scripture does not describe any post-Resurrection appearances of Jesus to His Mother, Mary, many saints have speculated that Jesus did appear to His Mother. For example, as Pope Saint John Paul II once remarked: The Gospels mention various appearances of the risen Christ, but not a meeting between Jesus and his Mother. This silence must not lead to the conclusion that after the Resurrection Christ did not appear to Mary… …Indeed, it is legitimate to think that the Mother was probably the first person to whom the risen Jesus appeared. (Pope Saint John Paul II, General Audience, May 21, 1997, accessed on Dec. 30, 2017 at  21 May 1997 | John Paul II )
Read more

When Vaccination Is An Act of Charity

Statement of the U.S. Bishops : The “gravity” of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and “the lack of availability of alternative vaccines,” are “sufficiently serious” reasons to accept the Pfizer/ BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, the chairmen of the U.S. bishops’ doctrine and pro-life committees said Dec. 14, 2020. “Receiving the COVID-19 vaccine ought to be understood as an act of charity toward the other members of our community,” they said. “In this way, being vaccinated safely against COVID-19 should be considered an act of love of our neighbor and part of our moral responsibility for the common good.” The bishops addressed the moral concerns raised by the fact the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have some connection to cell lines that originated with tissue taken from abortions. However, this connection to morally compromised cell lines is (a) indirect, and (b) extremely remote. Furthermore, (c) the public health situation is too grave to reject the vaccines, said Bishop Kevin C. Rhoades of
Read more